Religion: God and Moral Standards Essay

The topic that I have chosen to discuss for my concluding motiveative paper is Religion. I chose this topic be generate it plays a major role in my insouciant life. During this paper I leave behind discuss the most important part intimately worship, paragon. I provide discuss whether the conclusion of the existence of paragon is necessary. I situate out then talk about the argument for the existence of theology that I rule is the strongest and why I feel that it is. Then I testament discuss the foundations of the Universe and where it emerged from. A nonher topic that I discuss is whether or not one mass be moral and not take in perfection.Next I forget discuss whether or not science and religion argon in conflict. Gods omniscience and hu man trim will is another topic that will be covered during this paper. The last important topic that I will discuss during this paper is whether or not there is a rational argument for atheism. I conceive that this paper will be interesting for me to write. I deliberate that God will always be real in my heart, whether or not any physical proof is ever found of him. instruction about the various proofs of the existence of God was very interesting for me.I say this because I am a firm recallr in God and to think about how somewhat people clip his non-existence to them is hard for me to understand. The argument that seems to be the best to me is the Cosmological argument. The argument states that if something exists something else had to bring it into existence. It goes on to talk about how things that exist do so because something else caused it to exist. It calls the something that brought I into existence a first cause. The only thing or being that could qualify as the first cause is God. in that locationfore, God would be the p arnthoodating source of the origination, which I truly believe. I believe that philosophers have always sought proof of Gods existence because it was hard for them to belie ve that the world just happen one day. I think that they have always questioned the complexity of the world and knew there had to be some type of designer. I agree with this because the world is just too amazing and complex to just appear one day. til outright if you believe in evolution, you still would have to question where the first being or animal came from. Everything has an origin and I believe that God is the origin of the universe.So the next topic to be discussed is the foundation of the universe and from where did the universe emerge. It has been verbalize many times that scientists believe that our universe began with one enormous explosion of slide fastener and light, which is called the Big Bang. This is considered to be the start of space and of time itself. However, it is believed that something that is outside of space, time and matter that caused this to ejaculate into existence. This possible action was proven by astronomer Edwin Hubble in the late 1920s. The way that the Big Bang theory is described parallels what the bible says about the beginning of life.The bible states In the beginning, God created the heavens and the Earthand God said let there be light and there was light. I believe that this could be considered proof regarding the existence of God. I know that some scientists disagree and want to say that the universe came from the laws of physics, barely none of these things existed before the initial blast. Another part of religion is being a moral soul. So a question that has been asked is can one be moral and not believe in God? There are some people in todays society that believe that you preceptort need God to be moral, scarce I striket necessarily believe that.They believe that people can compulsive their possess rules for life, and have their own personal values. I befoolt believe that this would be a good idea considering the fact that everyones values are different, so there would be no standard for us to blis tering by. In parade for us to judge whether or not something moral or good then we should have a set of certain values that you would judge them by. It is said that to believe in God means that you believe in moral standards. Philosopher Immanuel Kant pointed out we need an omnipotent God to enforce moral standards to make sure that everyone is by rights rewarded and punished.He verbalize this because he believed that moral standards without moral sanctions dont mean overmuch. I believe that people live a more meaningful life when they believe in the morals created by God and not by man. I say this because I believe that man will come up with moral standards that will only benefit him, but God comes up with morals that will benefit everyone. However, I dont think this means that everyone that does not believe in God is immoral. There are some that still do good and behave responsibly without believing in him. I think that it just depends on the person and how they chose to live their lives.We will now go on to discuss whether or not science and religion are in conflict. It is said that most of the time science and religion are not in conflict, and that they only conflict on certain topics. One interpreter of their conflict would be whether or not the Earth is the center of the universe, or the sun the center of the universe. The church teaches that the Earth is the center and that the Sun, Moon and other planets range around it. However, some scientists have taught that the Sun is the center of the universe and that the Earth and other planets revolve around the Sun.Another example of conflict between science and religion is regarding the creation of man and Earth and evolution. Cosmologists believe that the universe is about 13. 7 billion years old, but the Earth is only 4. 5 billion years old. So this would mean that the universe was here long before the Earth, so therefore the universe could not revolve around the Earth. I still dont fully understand how they came up with their calculation, so I dont believe them. I still believe that God created the Earth and the universe at the same time.It has been stated that the conflict exist because science is ground on observation of nature, and religion is largely based on faith. I am more of a faith based person, so that is why I believe the God created the universe. We will now discuss whether or not Gods omniscience and human free will can be reconciled. Personally I dont think they can be reconciled. Free will is defined as the power of playing without the constraint of necessity or fate the ability to act at ones own discretion. It was said that because Gods foreknowledge determines all human choice and activity, then Gods omniscience conflicts with human free will.I am a worshipper in human free will, but I also believe in Gods omniscience. I believe that God does predetermine how he wants our lives to be, but he also gives us choices that will decide which path our lives will take. I have always believed that God has put certain people in our lives for a reason, and we are also sometimes put into certain situations for a reason. I believe that this is done in order to teach us a lesson and so we can learn to make better decisions on our own. So I believe that ultimately the two can work together perfectly.The final topic I will discuss is whether or not there is a rational argument for Atheism. Personally I dont agree with atheism, but I do understand that everyone has right to their own beliefs. It has been stated that people believe in atheism for a number of reasons. One example that is given is that they get tired of watching the multitude of bad things happening to good people in the world. As far as this statement goes, I was taught in church that it rains on the just (good), just alike(p) it rains on the unjust (bad), so you should not use this as an excuse to not believe in God.Another example is the people will say look at how some so-called C hristians live and behave. I lead a better life than most of them do. However, just because a person is a Christian and believes in God doesnt mean they will do no wrong. I was taught that there is no big sin or little sin, but as long as you repent and ask for forgiveness then you will be saved by the grace of God. I simply just dont believe that there is a rational argument for atheism, because I have been blessed too many times without a rational explanation for me not to believe in God.I say this because about fifteen years ago I was told by a doctor that I had a mass on my brain that looked like a tumor and that I would need to see a medical specialist in see if it was cancer. I went home upset and crying, but I pray all night. I went to church that Sunday and asked for prayer, the congregation prayed for me. I went to see the specialist the next week, who stated that there was not mass and that it was just part of my brain and there was no cancer. So I know personally what pr ayer can do, and nobody can make me feel different.In conclusion, I would like to rein irate how important religion is in my life. I real enjoyed writing this paper because it made me realize why I truly believe in God. There is no scientist or atheist that can make me stop believing in God. I never realized how much Philosophy deals with God until I took this course. It was interesting to read about the different Philosophers, and how they punctuate to prove that existence and non-existence of God. I hope that after reading this paper you can get a better understanding of my position on religion, and why I am a firm believer in God.