Theories of Power Transfer Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Theories of Power Transfer - Essay causaSurvival is the driving force, thus, states mustiness develop their offensive capabilities to increase their power. As a blame of this selfishness, and to picture their take in survival, states seek to develop their offensive capabilities, or their multitude power, so that they can take all over the territories of other states to increase their relative power. This means that their power is relative, that is, in relation to the other states (Fozouni, 2008).In the internationalist system of rules, the principal actors are the free states, where the independent influence of international organizations, sub-states or trans-state actors is dismissed. Nationalism is important, while the vastness of sub-national groupings or transnational ideological of cultural groupings are diminished.This theory has several key assumptions. Neorealism is based chiefly on the assumption that mankind is selfish and competitive. It is not benevolent, rath er it is self-centered. Its fundamental assumption is that the international system is chaotic and anarchic. Since the state is the primary actor, there is no higher governing authority to which they bow to. States must muddle through in their relations with each other, with no higher authority that can raise or dictate on any one of them. That is, there is no such thing as a world government. Furthermore, it assumes that sovereign states are the primary actors and not international institutions, non-government organizations, or multinational corporations. fit in to this theory, every state is a rational actor who leave always watch out for its own interest and ensure its security. In the pursuit of its own security, every state will do everything to earn up its resources, so that more resources will mean more power for the state. Their level of power will determine their relations with other states, and this level of power is in turn determined by its military and economic capa bilities. Also, states are inherently aggressive, always seeking to expand its territories. This territorial aggression is only hard-boiled by other states. However, this build-up will trigger an increase in the opposing states security, which will result in relative gains only (Thies, 2004).In terms of the European Union, this means that the Community itself, is merely a concourse of sovereign states - an international rather than supranational organization. Thus, the decision-making in terms of economic, monetary, political, and security matters is still in the sovereign states. Ultimate authority and power will remain with the member states. Thus, the Community is merely a reflection of the desires of the member states to cede or delegate authority, which they can easily recall or revoke. The primary reason that the Community appears to be integrated is because the member states feel that this will serve their interests best. Neorealists view the Community of the next as a lo ose integration of the member states who have agreed to surrender or consortium their sovereignty.NeoliberalismAs a response to neorealism, the neoliberalism was born. Some label this as Thatcherism (United Kingdom), Reaganomics (United States of America), Economic Rationalism (Australia), Rogernomics (New Zealand) or Manmohanomics (India). Neoliberalism describes a movement away from the state control. In its pure form, this theory centers on