The Negatives Of Genetic Engineering

The term genetic engine room was first coined by Jack Williamson in is science fiction novel Dragons Island, published in 1 951 ,one year before Donas role in heredity was substantiate by Alfred Hershey and Martha Chase, and two years before James Watson and Francis Crick showed that the desoxyribonucleic acid molecule has a double-helix structure, DNA stands for (desorbing cultic acid). For umpteen years, there has been a quarrel surrounding the morality of genetic modifying organisms.Some its unethical since it may lead to position effects such as mutation, others say its totally acceptable since it stinkpot make a stronger healthier and smarter organism. I tryingly believe that genetic engineering should be banned for multiple reasons such as religion, morals, physical attributes and cover species boundaries. In every country there is varied religions and these religions set out different views. One of these views argon on genetic engineering, whether it is acceptable or not modifying genes.God created us piece not perfect so why do we want to reach ne plus ultra when it is not a human trait. otherwise people who lack faith will tell you humans try on perfection its in their nature so its k modifying genes, but if we reached perfection what do we have to seek, we loud be perfect and lose our push of humanity. Is genetic engineering ethical to do, children who ar made with specific genes are produced for one specific reason and it is to help another person medically in other words they are made for being vacate for the specific person.In my sisters keeper a book about(predicate) a little girl who was a genetically modified to help her dying sister from pubic louse for 12 years she was used as a spare for her sister and when they precious to take a kidney, she took matter in her own detention and sued her parents for emancipation. So it is not moral or right to bring a person just to be spare. Although other people will fight down and say that by doing so they are saving lives, but they get dressed t think of the lives they are destroying .Gene modifying is not a 100% accurate, it has many mishaps one of the mishaps is a chronic disease which happened in 2001 at a reproductive facility in new jersey were thirty babies who are genetically modified and have genes of three different people, two women and a man some of these thirty children had turners syndrome and turners syndrome happens to one in very 2500 muff and in thirty babies it occurred more than twice is alarming. There people conflict that genetic modification has many benefits, like it increases polymorphism but what about mutations that occur in the children that born. Are they supposed to live with disabilities because some scientists wanted to play god. What about modifying genes to create a new species, are we entrap to see a new type of species walking around with us, scientists are talking about a new kind of humans that have the outer look of hum ans and the abilities of animals, do we want a human tiger that may be aggressive and be a destiny to other normal humans?