'Morality and Happiness Essay\r'

'Morality has been a term of study for several years by intellectuals who go by means of non come to the final conclusion of its definition. match to Damon (5), faith is an existing, multifaceted construct that may not be pinned down by whatsoever single definitional criteria which is flexible. The deterrent typeface caliber has long been associated with mirth which is that state of having graspd single’s desires although in that respect argon some(prenominal) disconnections. several(prenominal) theories have been forwarded in connection to lessonity and satis itemion as far as the hostelry is concerned.\r\nIn this argumentative paper we shall give detailed comp determinationium of object lessonisticity and felicitousness and whether or not clean-living instance is a necessary to triumph. Morality and contentment The concept of devotion utilizes the respective(prenominal)’s evaluation of horizontalts and actions to separate the profound from bad and stipulates mien accordant with the good. This kernel that there are socially pass judgment societal values that are promoted by morals. In addition, morality take ons the welfare of separates beyond our own self-serving desires and responsibility to express the same through caring, bounty and mercy.\r\nThe morality go kayoed also include fealty to hvirtuosost while bartering with all mountain coupled with concern for their rights and ensuring skillfulice and fair treatment. The more than distinguished fact intimately morality is that it provokes the ruttish responses such as guilty, fear and contempt whenever peerless goes against the good morals (Damon 5). On the other mitt contentment has been described by Kant to mean a constant well-organism, enjoyment of life, broad(a) doment with hotshot’s condition. The contentment is further extended to include the riches, honor, strength, good health coupled with satisfaction.\r\n therefrom i t is notes that contentment is a representation of preservation and welfare which is the total satisfaction of all personal needs and preferences. It is important to realize that triumph is not pleasure plainly quite a it is simply obtaining what you want in life. hence happiness is bring home the bacond with the fulfillment of both desire of an single(a) irrespective of its nature (Hughes 61 & 62). We shall beggarly the following arguments on these definitions of happiness and morality. Moral fashion is a Requirement to Happiness\r\nTo begin with, the society has closely connected good moral appearance to happiness. This is evidenced by the fact that philosophers, parents and teachers are advance good role with the belief that those individuals who are meet plump better and felicitous lives as compared to those behaving disadvantageously (Delattre 136 & 137). With their encouragement, the society has been do to belief that a good moral behavior is a urgen cy to happiness. The children who are growing are beingness develop that they forget be happy if they observe a good moral character.\r\nThese teachings have been able to incline the society that for an individual to be happy they have to be virtuously adept. The other fact is that character faults do not make an individual happy. This is because the chastely corrupt individual wadnot be trusted even by close friends and relatives. They leave behind constantly live in fear of the commonwealth that they have wronged. This means that they cannot be happy leaving provided the morally upright to be happy. Thus we can begin at the fact that good moral character is a need to happiness since the reverse is not true.\r\nThis fact is that decent people are happier than fateial individuals (Delattre 137). Moreover, the process of seeking happiness is not flying and it requires patients and sufficient skills. The Novelist Robertson Davies compared happiness to a cat where if y ou go after it run away however if you go virtually your business without disturbing its peace then it volition warm up to you and be your friend. thereof evenly happiness cannot be bring home the bacond by aggressive actions but rather small random morally upright actions.\r\nThus paying attention to little actions at work and private life impart furnish happiness to come to you. In the event that you crisply use any means including immoral behavior to gain happiness then it could elude you. An practice session is if we go out to have fun with friends we will end up being happy in the long term (Delattre 137). Thus it becomes a requirement that good moral character be ascertained always in order to gain a long-term happiness without any struggle. Moreover, the morality, good character and happiness cannot be separated from one another.\r\nThis is because to a huge extent we tend to offer as the best individuals to our families, friend and colleagues who are the source of our happiness. Therefore there is an understanding that we can enjoy their fellowship when we offer our best morals and support. With this understanding, we realize that a good moral character is a requirement to true happiness irrespective of the people we are dealing with. This understanding enables individuals to realize and prevent any moral deviation so as to check happiness with all persons (Delattre 137).\r\nAccording to the philosophy of happiness (14, 15, 16 & 17), Aristotle stated the factors that make happiness as good health, money, relationships and good moral behavior. Aristotle pointed out that happiness was the ultimate desire for human being leaving zero point more to be desired. The happiness is sought for its own sake unlike other things which are sought in order to achieve happiness. Aristotle understood that for an individual to be happy one must be of good morals and can suffer to achieve the greater happiness later in the long run.\r\nMany individuals believe that happiness is different to each person but Aristotle thinks that there is only a single genuine spirit and that it is similar for all human beings. Therefore power does not contribute to happiness since it would exclude some people from being happy whenever they are subjects of power. Thus history and written articles including Aristotle’s have made individuals to believe that the requirement to happiness is a good moral behavior. Moral Behavior is not a Requirement to Happiness On the other hand, it is not a requirement that for one to gain moral happiness they should be able to be morally upright.\r\nThere are those people who belief that any happiness cannot be achieved by doing the right. They believe that only wrong actions will put them in a position to be happy because their wishes and desires are not limited by moral standing. These individuals believe that by doing the wrong actions they could benefit from their profits which in put to work would make them happy. One pillowcase is that of buddy boys who deal with drugs which are harmful in the society but they claim that the money gained from the immoral trading will make them happy (Delattre 137).\r\nTherefore we cannot interpolate that happiness is achieved out of moral behavior because others have achieved through illegal and wrong actions. Although they feel guilty about their wrongdoings, they tend to concentrate on the pleasure part of their actions which is money for entertainment. The other fact is that of job where an individual work is in a risk environment. For example a police officeholder would be doing the moral right to secure citizens. However, they may get killed by the thugs who do not care of their lives but rather their benefits of terrorizing the citizens.\r\nThis means that even though the police officer was actively doing the right duties under good morals, they end up being killed and as such do not become happy but their families end up unhappy. Thus we can submit that happiness does not require a good moral behavior because this example shows that even good actions of duty do not guarantee happiness. Another example is where an officer reports a corrupt colleague in the spirit of doing good morals but ends up being segregated and becomes continuously unhappy (Delattre 137).\r\nAccording to Hughes (64), Kant says that it is not true that doing the right thing leads to happiness in all circumstances as states by the doctrine of happiness. In fact he goes on to explain that morality could often hinder the accomplishment of one’s desires if they are considered immoral. Thus we cannot generalize that moral behavior is a requirement to happiness. Moreover, Kant continues to say that the process of making somebody happy has nothing to do with moral behavior of that person. This means that it is feasible that many people are able to fulfill their desires and become happy without necessarily being moral.\r\nIn any case somebo dy could be morally good but fail to be happy in life giving justification to the actions of those people who want happiness at the expense of morality. Moreover, the rationale of happiness bases morality as an incentive to happiness which in itself is not moral. This means people will seek to be moral for the sake of happiness and not for the sake of morality (Delattre 137). Therefore if the morality is just an incentive to happiness, it means that others may achieve happiness without the use of incentive. Thus we can shut that morality is not a requirement to happiness.\r\n afterwards a serious consideration, I agree to the fact that morality is a requirement to genuine happiness. This is because individuals just want to be happy and could do anything to achieve desired happiness including good morals. By being genuinely happy, individuals do not have that sense datum of having done wrong to achieve their happiness and will live with sufficient peace of mind. If a occurrence w here the whole society must practice morality then it would allow everyone the non-competitive search for happiness and the wide society will be happy in the long run.\r\n'