Writing For Research

Discussion QuestionWhat are some of the typical errors that a detective should look for when reviewing journals researches published on scientific journals have underg 1 a review process in to determine if the header phrase had followed the established rules and standards of empirical inquiry , thus it is assumed that when a question is published , it has passed the scrutiny of experts in its palm . but , this is not always true to form reviewers do not always scrutinize inquiry articles for the lack of while and exertion . Moreover , some inquiryes are published in journals that totally have very few reviewers (Martella , Nelson Marchand-Martella 1999 . Therefore , as consumers of research , we must still be alert to the affirmable errors that a research article may haveIn reviewing journals , the first topic to chat ter is how the research questions have been stated and whether it is supported by capable belles-lettres . Sometimes , due to the limited countersignature continuance , the background and literature review of the body of work is presented as one section , a well-written article must require literature that supports the research questions whether it be theory or research found (Martella , Nelson Marchand-Martella , 1999 . The next part to inspect is the methods section of the study , the take in methods , research institution instruments , statistical abstract must be clearly identified , and that it should be the or so appropriate for the design of the study .

Moreover the research methods should agree with the research questions , if the research intends to prove causality , then the statistical tools and the design of the research methods should alike lead to establishing causality . How the info had been analyzed and the discussions presented by the author of the results of the study should also be inspected . The results should be accurately presented and the discussion should answer the research questions of the study , likewise it should also be interpreted in the scant(p) of previous researches and findings . The finis and recommendations section are usually alter with error in particular when the researcher makes conclusions and recommendations that are beyond the scope of the study (Martella , Nelson Marchand-Martella , 1999ReferenceMartella , R , Nelson , R Marchand-Martella , N (1999 . Research methods : Learning tobecome a searing research consumer . Needham Heights , MA : Allyn Bacon...If you deficienc y to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper